<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aiden Tailor &#187; Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aidentailor.net/category/flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aidentailor.net</link>
	<description>another awesome actionscript blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:34:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Quick Tip: Flash Content in Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/03/18/quick-tip-swfobject-2-fullscreen-firefox-3-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/03/18/quick-tip-swfobject-2-fullscreen-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Tailor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aidentailor.net/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had some trouble delivering full width &#38; height flash content to Firefox 3.6 in the last days and I found two different solutions that will work fine. Doctype First of all beware of the documents doctype! I use this one to be safe: (without the spaces on both ends) < !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/03/18/quick-tip-swfobject-2-fullscreen-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nimble &#8211; lightweight fluid layout</title>
		<link>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/17/nimble-lightweight-fluid-layout/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/17/nimble-lightweight-fluid-layout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Tailor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aidentailor.net/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is Nimble? Nimble is an open source and lightweight framework to easily achieve a fluid layout within a Flash application using ActionScript 3.0. But what do I mean with the phrase &#8220;fluid layout&#8221;? Let&#8217;s have a look at the following graphic: Have a look a an example and resize the browser window a few [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/17/nimble-lightweight-fluid-layout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Flash, Apple and the developers</title>
		<link>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/11/adobe-flash-apple-and-the-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/11/adobe-flash-apple-and-the-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Tailor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aidentailor.net/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After all the posts and discussions of the last weeks I can’t hold on my opinion anymore. Seriously this discussion is out of control. It started fairly well with the flash community frustration as Apple unveiled their latest device, the iPad, but by now people are all getting crazy about HTML5 vs. Flash. In my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/11/adobe-flash-apple-and-the-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ActionScript performance #loops</title>
		<link>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/03/actionscript-performance-loops/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/03/actionscript-performance-loops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Tailor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aidentailor.net/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing with the ActionScript performance series, I want to tell you a tweak on for-loops. So let&#8217;s start with the examples right away. The regular syntax Usually everybody learned to write a for-loop like this: private function regularLoop() : void { for (var i:int = 0; i &#60; dataList.length; i++) {} } Now let&#8217;s try [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/02/03/actionscript-performance-loops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ActionScript performance #Arrays</title>
		<link>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/01/20/actionscript-performance-arrays/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/01/20/actionscript-performance-arrays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Tailor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aidentailor.net/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Flash community rapidly walks towards the mobile devices, we especially need to think about how well our code performs. On a mobile device, the hardware specs are much lower than on a regular desktop pc, hence, for example, an application must only use as much memory as it really needs. Furthermore one needs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.aidentailor.net/2010/01/20/actionscript-performance-arrays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

